Here are 15 current and former national security officials in their own words reviewing the threats posed by climate change:
- Thomas Fingar, former chairman of President Bush’s National
Intelligence Council: “We judge global climate change will have wide-ranging
implications for U.S. national security interests over the next 20 years … We
judge that the most significant impact for the United States will be indirect
and result from climate-driven effects on many other countries and their
potential to seriously affect U.S. national security interests.”
- Brig. General Steven Anderson, USA (Ret.), former Chief of
Logistics under General Petraeus and a self-described “conservative Republican”:
“Our oil addiction, I believe, is our greatest threat to our national security.
Not just foreign oil but oil in general. Because I believe that in CO2 emissions
and climate change and the instability that that all drives, I think that that
increases the likelihood there will be conflicts in which American soldiers are
going to have to fight and die somewhere.”
- Leon Panetta, Secretary of Defense: “[T]he area of climate
change has a dramatic impact on national security: rising sea levels, to severe
droughts, to the melting of the polar caps, to more frequent and devastating
natural disasters all raise demand for humanitarian assistance and disaster
relief.”
- Robert Gates, former Secretary of Defense: “Over the next 20
years and more, certain pressures-population, energy, climate, economic,
environmental-could combine with rapid cultural, social, and technological
change to produce new sources of deprivation, rage, and instability.”
- General Gordon Sullivan, USA (Ret.), former Army chief of
staff: “Climate change is a national security issue. We found that climate
instability will lead to instability in geopolitics and impact American military
operations around the world.”
- Vice Admiral Dennis McGinn, USN (Ret.): “If the destabilizing
effects of climate change go unchecked, we can expect more frequent, widespread,
and intense failed state scenarios creating large scale humanitarian disasters
and higher potential for conflict and terrorism … The Department of Defense and
national intelligence communities recognize this clear link between climate
change, national security, and instability and have begun strategic plans and
programs to both mitigate and adapt to the most likely and serious effects in
key areas around the globe.”
- General Anthony Zinni, USMC (Ret.), former Commander-in-Chief
of U.S. Central Command and special envoy to Israel and Palestine under
President George W. Bush: “It’s not hard to make the connection between climate
change and instability, or climate change and terrorism.”
- Admiral Joseph Lopez, USN (Ret.): “Climate change will provide
the conditions that will extend the war on terror.”
- General Chuck Wald, USAF (Ret.), former Deputy Commander
of U.S. European Command under President George W. Bush: “People can say what
they want to about whether they think climate change is manmade or not, but
there’s a problem there and the military is going to be a part of the solution.
It’s a national security issue because it affects the stability of certain
places in the world.”
- Brig. General Bob Barnes, USA (Ret.): “While most people
associate global warming with droughts, rising sea levels, declining food
production, species extinction and habitat destruction, fewer connect these
impacts to increasing instability around the globe and the resulting threats to
our national security. But the connection—and the threat it poses—is real and
growing.”
- Vice Admiral Richard Truly, USN (Ret.), former NASA
administrator: “The stresses that climate change will put on our national
security will be different than any we’ve dealt with in the past.”
- General Paul Kern, USA (Ret.), Commander of the United States
Army Materiel Command under President George W. Bush: “Military planning should
view climate change as a threat to the balance of energy access, water supplies,
and a healthy environment, and it should require a response.’
- Lt. General Lawrence Farrell, USAF (Ret.): “The planning we do
that goes into organizing, training, and equipping our military considers all
the risks that we may face. And one of the risks we see right now is climate
change.”
- Admiral John Nathman, USN (Ret.), former Commander of the U.S.
Fleet Forces Command under President George W. Bush: “There are serious risks to
doing nothing about climate change. We can pay now or we’re going to pay a whole
lot later. The U.S. has a unique opportunity to become energy independent,
protect our national security and boost our economy while reducing our carbon
footprint. We’ve been a model of success for the rest of the world in the past
and now we must lead the way on climate change.”
- Vice Admiral Lee Gunn, USN (Ret.): “The national security
community is rightly worried about climate change because of the magnitude of
its expected impacts around the globe, even in our own country … Climate change
poses a clear and present danger to the United States of America. But if we
respond appropriately, I believe we will enhance our security, not simply by
averting the worst climate change impacts, but by spurring a new energy
revolution.”
Related Articles
US Military: More Renewable Energy Less Fossil Fuel
Veterans Support Clean Energy
President Obama’s 2013 Environmental Budget
US Military may Stop Buying Biofuels
Obama Makes Good on Promises with Executive Orders
How to get Through to Climate Change Deniers
