South Korea has passed legislation that will see the introduction of a
greenhouse gas emissions trading program in which companies
will buy or sell rights to emit carbon dioxide. Although the legislation had bipartisan support working out the details may be difficult.
As reported in
It is projected to cover around 60 percent of the country’s carbon pollution
by imposing limits on facilities that produce more than 25,000 tons of CO2 a
year. About 450 facilities are likely to become subject to it. Penalties on
non-compliers are set at three times the prevailing market price of carbon or a
maximum of 100,000 won ($87) per ton.
Ninety-five percent of the permits will be given away for free in the first
few years, with some export-oriented industries receiving a full 100 percent.
Each permit represents a ton of carbon emissions.
“Korea has rolled out many projects on green growth so far, but the carbon
emissions trading scheme is the most important of all and the one that will
propel the ongoing efforts to a new level,” said Yang Soo-gil, chairman of the
Presidential Committee on Green Growth.
South Korea, Asia’s fourth largest economy, aims to reduce carbon emissions by 30 percent from projected levels by 2020. Korea is the world’s eighth-largest emitter of carbon pollution based on 2009 figures from the International Energy Agency. The country’s greenhouse-gas emissions jumped to about 640 million metric tons in 2011 from 350 million metric tons in 1990, making it the
fastest-growing emissions source among 34 nations in the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development.
“We anticipate a major shift in the country’s overall energy policies to
follow in a near future to steer the domestic economy toward a low-carbon green
economy,” Kim Sang-goo, an analyst at Kiwoom Securities, said.
Impacted industries are expected to resist the legislation once the details
are ironed out.
The local business community had opposed the plan from its inception, saying
that it would put Korean firms at a disadvantage in the global market because
their competitors in bigger economies and bigger polluters ― namely the US,
Japan and China ― are not subject to such a cap.
Although the law stipulates that 95 percent or more of the permits
may be given for free, there will likely be resistance from industries that would like to see an even higher ratio.
reserved.
Related Posts
Corporate Sustainability Strategies in Asia Part1 (Video)
Corporate Sustainability Strategies in Asia Part2 (Video)
Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia
Korea’s Green Growth
Korea’s Green Growth (Video)
Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia
Global Carbon Market will Grow in 2012 then Decline
The Success of RGGI Carbon Trading Shows Cap-and-Trade Works
California is Leading the US with a Cap-and-Trade
US Cap-and-Trade Implications for Business
US Cap-and-Trade: What and Why
Small Business Can Save US Cap-and-Trade
US Cap-and-Trade: Obstacles and Solutions
Cap-and-Trade Legislation Faces Opposition
Helping Small Business Accept US Cap-and-Trade
US Cap-and-Trade: Positioning Your Business
Green Capitalism
Korean (Hyundai & Kia) Greener Cars
The Kochs’ Americans for Prosperity Actively Undermines Cap-and-Trade
Even North Korea is Investing in Renewables
Discover more from Change Oracle
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
