Monday, September 28, 2026
Change Oracle Logo
  • Climate Change
    • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • Biodiversity
    • Extreme Weather
  • Energy
    • Renewables
    • Nuclear Power
    • Fossil Fuels
  • Politics
    • American Politics
    • Canadian Politics
    • International Politics
  • Social Change
    • Activism
    • Disinformation
    • Education
    • Psychology
    • Gender Equality
  • Business and Economics
    • Leadership
    • Decarbonization
    • Economics
    • Supply Chains
    • Investing
  • Technology
    • Carbon Removal
    • Carbon Capture
    • Transportation
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Food
  • Polycrisis
No Result
View All Result
  • Climate Change
    • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • Biodiversity
    • Extreme Weather
  • Energy
    • Renewables
    • Nuclear Power
    • Fossil Fuels
  • Politics
    • American Politics
    • Canadian Politics
    • International Politics
  • Social Change
    • Activism
    • Disinformation
    • Education
    • Psychology
    • Gender Equality
  • Business and Economics
    • Leadership
    • Decarbonization
    • Economics
    • Supply Chains
    • Investing
  • Technology
    • Carbon Removal
    • Carbon Capture
    • Transportation
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Food
  • Polycrisis
No Result
View All Result
Change Oracle Logo
No Result
View All Result
Home Other

The EIA’s Emissions Analysis by US States

by Change Oracle
May 15, 2013
in Other
0
In May, the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) released an analysis titled, State-Level Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, According to the EIA’s assessment, between 2000 and 2010, CO2 emissions fell in 32 states and rose in 18 states. However, from 2009 to 2010, only 14 states saw a decrease in emissions. This increase is attributable to the fact that the US was emerging from recession. The greatest percentage decrease in CO2 emissions occurred in Delaware at 27.9 percent, (4.5 million metric tons). The greatest absolute decline was 58.8 million metric tons in Texas (8.3 percent). New York experienced a decline of 38.6 million metric tons (18.3 percent). The greatest percentage increase was in Nebraska at 16.0 percent (6.6 million metric tons), while Colorado experienced the greatest absolute increase (11.8 million metric tons or 13.9 percent).


A state’s emissions profile is largely determined by the types of fuels they use. Coal, petroleum and natural gas are the primary causes of CO2 emissions.

The differences in emission profiles are illustrated by a comparison of Vermont and Hawaii. In Vermont the largest share of emissions in 2010 came from the transportation sector (58.7 percent), predominantly from petroleum. Electric power sector has a low emissions profile (0.1 percent) because of Vermont’s reliance on nuclear power. However, because of the cold climate Vermont’s residential sector share was 22.1 percent because petroleum is the main heating fuel. Conversely in Hawaii the residential share is the lowest (0.3 percent) because of minimal heating and cooling requirements. Like Vermont, the transportation sector accounted for the largest share of emissions (49.3 percent). But unlike Vermont, Hawaii’s electric power sector share nearly as high (40.1 percent). The dominant fossil fuel for the generation of electricity in Hawaii is petroleum.

In terms of emissions per capita, 2010 CO2 emissions in Wyoming were 118.5 metric tons per capita, which is the highest in the U.S. In 2010, This is largely due to Wyoming relatively small population (less than 600 thousand people), low population density and cold climate. Wyoming is also the second largest energy producer in the US after Texas which does not fare as badly on the per capita metrics due to the state’s population of 25 million,

The state of New York, with a population of 19.6 million people, had the lowest per capita CO2 emissions—8.8 metric tons per capita largely due to the population density in New York City and an effective mass transit system. Further New York’s economy is oriented towards high-value, low-energy-consuming activities such as financial markets.

The carbon intensity of energy supply (CO2/Btu) is reflective of the energy fuel mix within a state. Sates with high carbon intensity of energy supply tend to be the states with high per capita emissions. The top five states in 2010 for the energy carbon intensity as measured in kilograms of CO2 per million Btu (kg CO2/MMBtu)—West Virginia (81.7 kg CO2/MMBtu), Kentucky (77.2 kg CO2/MMBtu), Wyoming (76.8 kg CO2/MMBtu), Indiana (75.1 kg CO2/MMBtu) and North Dakota (73.6 kg CO2/MMBtu)—are all states with coal as the dominant fuel.

The states with lower carbon intensity tend to be those states with relatively substantial non-carbon electricity generation such as hydropower or nuclear. These states include, for example, Vermont (34.5 kg CO2/MMBtu), Washington (37.4 kg CO2/MMBtu), Oregon (39.1 kg CO2/MMBtu), Idaho (41.2 kg CO2/MMBtu) and New Hampshire (41.5 kg CO2/MMBtu).

The states with the highest carbon intensity of their economies as measured in metric tons of CO2 per million dollars of state GDP (mt CO2/million dollars of GDP) are also the states with the highest values of energy intensity and carbon intensity of that energy supply. In 2010 these states included: Wyoming (1,886 mt CO2/ million dollars of GDP), West Virginia (1,767 mt CO2/ million dollars of GDP) North Dakota (1,681 mt CO2/ million dollars of GDP), Louisiana (1,145 mt CO2/ million dollars of GDP), and Montana (1,098 mt CO2/ million dollars of GDP). The 2010, U.S. average is 430 mt CO2/ million dollars of GDP. The states with the lowest carbon intensity of economic activity are also states that appear on the lower end of both energy intensity and the carbon intensity of that energy supply. These states include: New York (167 mt CO2/ million dollars of GDP), Connecticut (175 mt CO2/ million dollars of GDP), Delaware (209 mt CO2/ million dollars of GDP), Massachusetts (213 mt CO2/ million dollars of GDP), and California (214 mt CO2/ million dollars of GDP).

This analysis does not account for electricity trade, if this were factored in it can influence a state’s CO2 emissions profile. Over half of the 10 states with the highest per capita emissions the states are net exporters of electricity in at least some years. In particular, Wyoming, North Dakota, West Virginia and Montana are large electricity exporters of power produced predominantly with coal. .

Four of the 10 states with the lowest per capita CO2 emissions are consistent importers of electricity: Idaho, California, Massachusetts and Florida.

Click here to see the EIA’s monthly estimates of nationwide CO2 emissions from the consumption of energy
Click here to see short-term projection reports and here to see projection reports of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions through 2040.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Articles
Report on Global Emissions Reduction
The Way Forward on US Emissions Reductions
Global Fossil Fuel Emissions Data for 2011 from the CDIAC
US Demands Emissions Reductions from China and India
World Resources Institute Warning About New Coal Plants
Canada is a World Leader in GHG Emissions
Canada’s GHG Rankings
Businesses Need to Do More to Reduce Emissions
10 Leading Wind Energy Countries
Carbon Rankings from the Environmental Investment Organization 
North America 300 Carbon Ranking 2011
Global 800 Carbon Ranking 2011


Discover more from Change Oracle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Share
Previous Post

World Bank President Advocates Putting a Price on Carbon

Next Post

Why Oil Prices Matter for Renewable Energy

Change Oracle

Change Oracle

Richard Matthews is a researcher, writer, journalist, consultant, and change activist. He has published thousands of articles and contributed to reports for policymakers including a United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) publication. His critical, interdisciplinary analyses have been cited by a wide array of academic publications. His research interests include carbon removal, nuclear power, and disinformation. He is currently spearheading Change Oracle’s Polycrisis Project (COPP).

Related Posts

trump voter suppression

Trump’s Voter Suppression Machine is Rigging the 2026 Midterm Elections

by Change Oracle
August 31, 2026
0

The greatest threat to election security is not coming from Russia, China or Iran, it is coming from within the Whitehouse. U.S. President Donald Trump has leveraged the powers of...

climate change and heat waves in the summer 2026

Unrelenting Global Heat: How Rising Temperatures Are Collapsing Terrestrial and Marine Ecosystems

by Change Oracle
July 20, 2026
0

The trajectory of planetary heating has escalated at an alarming rate, transforming what were once considered extreme anomalies into a harrowing baseline reality. With greenhouse gas emissions continuing to rise,...

The Iran War as a Polycrisis Case Study

by Change Oracle
June 22, 2026
0

Through a systems thinking lens, the individual crises associated with the 2026 war in Iran are all facets of a singular crisis.  The resultant cascade of damaging consequences illustrates the...

Next Post

Why Oil Prices Matter for Renewable Energy

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Subscribe on Substack

Follow Change Oracle

  • Spotify
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
  • Email

Podcasts

trump voter suppression
American Politics

Trump’s Voter Suppression Machine is Rigging the 2026 Midterm Elections

by Change Oracle
August 31, 2026
0

The greatest threat to election security is not coming from Russia, China or Iran, it is coming from within the...

Read moreDetails
climate change and heat waves in the summer 2026

Unrelenting Global Heat: How Rising Temperatures Are Collapsing Terrestrial and Marine Ecosystems

July 20, 2026

The Iran War as a Polycrisis Case Study

June 22, 2026

Chainsaw Governance: What is Behind the Administration’s Purge of Federal Employees

May 4, 2026

Feedback Loops and the Polycrisis: Interconnected Systems From Doom Loops to Virtuous Cycles

March 23, 2026
  • About
  • Podcasts & Videos
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Business and Economics
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Social Change
  • Polycrisis
  • Other

© 2024 Copyright Change Oracle.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Polycrisis
  • Business and Economics
    • Leadership
    • Supply Chains
  • Economics
  • Energy
    • Renewables
    • Nuclear Power
    • Fossil Fuels
  • Climate Change
    • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • Biodiversity
    • Extreme Weather
  • Investing
  • Politics
    • American Politics
    • Canadian Politics
    • International Politics
  • Technology
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Carbon Capture
    • Food
    • Transportation
  • Social Change
    • Education
    • Activism
    • Psychology

© 2024 Copyright Change Oracle.

Discover more from Change Oracle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from Change Oracle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading