Tuesday, November 10, 2026
Change Oracle Logo
  • Climate Change
    • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • Biodiversity
    • Extreme Weather
  • Energy
    • Renewables
    • Nuclear Power
    • Fossil Fuels
  • Politics
    • American Politics
    • Canadian Politics
    • International Politics
  • Social Change
    • Activism
    • Disinformation
    • Education
    • Psychology
    • Gender Equality
  • Business and Economics
    • Leadership
    • Decarbonization
    • Economics
    • Supply Chains
    • Investing
  • Technology
    • Carbon Removal
    • Carbon Capture
    • Transportation
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Food
  • Polycrisis
No Result
View All Result
  • Climate Change
    • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • Biodiversity
    • Extreme Weather
  • Energy
    • Renewables
    • Nuclear Power
    • Fossil Fuels
  • Politics
    • American Politics
    • Canadian Politics
    • International Politics
  • Social Change
    • Activism
    • Disinformation
    • Education
    • Psychology
    • Gender Equality
  • Business and Economics
    • Leadership
    • Decarbonization
    • Economics
    • Supply Chains
    • Investing
  • Technology
    • Carbon Removal
    • Carbon Capture
    • Transportation
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Food
  • Polycrisis
No Result
View All Result
Change Oracle Logo
No Result
View All Result
Home Business and Economics

Is Apple’s Adoption of Sustainability Too Little Too Late?

by Change Oracle
June 10, 2013
in Business and Economics, Leadership, Other
0

Apple is trying to offset its long history of  unsustainable practices through a number of initiatives that include hiring former EPA head Lisa Jackson. Even if the company manages to clean up its act, they may be haunted by their past for years to come. As Apple strives to improve its sustainable performance, the company is being battered by allegations of tax avoidance. Over the last few years Apple has been plagued with a number of problems including criticisms of their labor force in China, concerns about their supply chain and a forced reversal on EPEAT.

These factors seem to have eroded the firm’s bottom line. Apple’s profits and stock valuations have all suffered in recent months. From the beginning of 2009 until the end of 2012 Apple’s (AAPL) meteoric rise seemed unstoppable. Then the stock plummeted losing almost half its value in the first quarter of 2013 (Going from a high of more than $700 per share in September 2012 to $390 per share in April, 2013).

In 2011, Apple was accused of treating its Chinese workforce “inhumanely.” Apple’s supply chain has also been accused of being unsustainable, and according to a report issued by anti-pollution activists in China, Apple’s secretive supply chain is both “dirty” and “poisonous.”

Apple has done a 180 with its suppliers in China. In terms of progressive environmental policies, the company has gone from being one of the most uncooperative electronics companies to one of China’s most proactive IT suppliers. Although Apple has significantly increased its sustainability efforts in a bid to try to catch up with other tech companies. One of the most significant efforts is Apple’s new 500,000-square-foot data center in Maiden, N.C., which will be entirely powered by renewable energy.

In July, 2012, Apple reversed its position on EPEAT. This reversal demonstrates the company’s recognition of the value of sustainability to its customer base. Apple was forced to capitulate on EPEAT due to the burgeoning demand for more responsible corporate conduct from customers, institutional buyers and activists. It also reflects the purchasing and procurement policies of institutional buyers like Kaiser Permanente, McKesson and HDR which demand EPEAT certification.

If nothing else, Apple is a marketing Svengali. Like the villainous hypnotist in George du Maurier’s novel Trilby, the firm has managed to control the public’s perception. But the company’s unsustainable history cannot be concealed forever.

As explained in a Fortune article, despite being anything but green, Apple has excelled at promoting itself as a responsible corporate global citizen in terms of environmental, social and governance issues. According to Brandlogic’s 2012 Sustainability Leadership Report, Apple is a company “whose perceived performance far exceeds its actual achievement.”

In 2012, Brandlogic’s Denis Riney offered this assessment:

“On the reality side,” he writes, “Apple made significant gains from 2012 to 2011, improving their SRS [sustainability reality score] from 29.3 to 45.8, a 16.5 point increase vs. a 9.3-point increase for the 100 companies overall. Its perceived ESG [environmental, social, governance] scores increased as well, from 53.5 to 55.6, in year when the average perception score dropped 2.7 points.”

According to the 2012 Brandindex Sustainability Leadership Report Apple’s ability to fool the public is especially pronounced in the developing world. Apple’s reputation is falling among investment professionals but rising among recent university graduates and supply chain professionals:

However, Apple’s unsustainable design which on the one hand are part of a marketing strategy that has led to astronomical profits on the other makes the company a sustainability laggard. A business model that encourages people to regularly upgrade technological devices is doomed to fail in an increasingly resource constrained world.

It looks as though Apple’s CEO Tim Cook is getting the message. At the end of May 2013 he announced that the company has hired former US Environmental Protection Agency Chief Lisa Jackson to oversee environmental activities including greentech and efficiency.

“Apple has shown how innovation can drive real progress by removing toxics from its products, incorporating renewable energy in its data center plans, and continually raising the bar for energy efficiency in the electronics industry,” Jackson said. “I look forward to helping support and promote these efforts, as well as leading new ones in the future aimed at protecting the environment.”

Only time will tell if hiring Jackson and other sustainability initiatives can bridge the gap between the public’s perception of the brand and its actual performance.

“While there is no doubt that the positive halo around the Apple brand has some influence on the perceptions of these audiences,” Riney concludes, “it is hard to imagine that Apple’s extreme Promoter position will last long term.”

Apple is trying to catch-up on sustainability, however, the chickens may have come home to roost. The company, once the darling of the tech industry, has a hard road to hoe. Despite the positive perception of the brand in 2012, a March report which showed a 114 percent increase in the use of renewable energy and hiring Jackson in May.

Although Apple should be lauded for its efforts, the fact that it is a late-comer to the sustainability table constitutes a serious problem for the brand. This is particularly true of a corporate behemoth like Apple, where their efforts may be seen as too little too late.

© 2013, Richard Matthews. All rights reserved.

Related Posts
Apple’s Reversal on EPEAT 

Steve Jobs: Apple’s Product Recycling Efforts
Under Steve Jobs Leadership Apple Removed Toxic Chemicals from its Products
Video: Steve Jobs 2005 Stanford Commencement Speech

Video: Steve Jobs on Computer Efficiency


Apple’s iPhone Green Applications

10 Energy Efficient Electronics for College

Greenpeace Green Electronics Guide

Greenpeace’s Ranking of Electronic Companies
Cleantech the Next Great Investment Opportunity
Top 10 Global Sustainability Leaders (Report)


Discover more from Change Oracle

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Share
Previous Post

Redrawing the Energy-Climate Map: World Energy Outlook Special Report

Next Post

ISO Revisions Seek Overarching Guidance on 14001 Environmental Management Systems and Other ISO Standards

Change Oracle

Change Oracle

Richard Matthews is a researcher, writer, journalist, consultant, and change activist. He has published thousands of articles and contributed to reports for policymakers including a United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) publication. His critical, interdisciplinary analyses have been cited by a wide array of academic publications. His research interests include carbon removal, nuclear power, and disinformation. He is currently spearheading Change Oracle’s Polycrisis Project (COPP).

Related Posts

trump transactional presidency

The Transactional Presidency: Inside Trump’s Multi-Billion-Dollar Corruption Machine

by Change Oracle
November 2, 2026
0

The machinery of the federal government is being used to create, protect, and expand the president’s financial empire. Campaign finance, foreign capital, cryptocurrency, insider access, executive pardons, and the dismantling...

The War on Science Is a War on Reality

by Change Oracle
October 5, 2026
0

Science is supposed to be one of the places where political power stops. A president can make a claim, a political party can promote an ideology, a billionaire can fund...

trump voter suppression

Trump’s Voter Suppression Machine is Rigging the 2026 Midterm Elections

by Change Oracle
August 31, 2026
0

The greatest threat to election security is not coming from Russia, China or Iran, it is coming from within the Whitehouse. U.S. President Donald Trump has leveraged the powers of...

Next Post

ISO Revisions Seek Overarching Guidance on 14001 Environmental Management Systems and Other ISO Standards

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Subscribe on Substack

Follow Change Oracle

  • Spotify
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
  • Email

Podcasts

American Politics

The War on Science Is a War on Reality

by Change Oracle
October 5, 2026
0

Science is supposed to be one of the places where political power stops. A president can make a claim, a...

Read moreDetails
trump voter suppression

Trump’s Voter Suppression Machine is Rigging the 2026 Midterm Elections

August 31, 2026
climate change and heat waves in the summer 2026

Unrelenting Global Heat: How Rising Temperatures Are Collapsing Terrestrial and Marine Ecosystems

July 20, 2026

The Iran War as a Polycrisis Case Study

June 22, 2026

Chainsaw Governance: What is Behind the Administration’s Purge of Federal Employees

May 4, 2026
  • About
  • Podcasts & Videos
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Business and Economics
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Social Change
  • Polycrisis
  • Other

© 2024 Copyright Change Oracle.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Polycrisis
  • Business and Economics
    • Leadership
    • Supply Chains
  • Economics
  • Energy
    • Renewables
    • Nuclear Power
    • Fossil Fuels
  • Climate Change
    • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • Biodiversity
    • Extreme Weather
  • Investing
  • Politics
    • American Politics
    • Canadian Politics
    • International Politics
  • Technology
    • Buildings & Infrastructure
    • Carbon Capture
    • Food
    • Transportation
  • Social Change
    • Education
    • Activism
    • Psychology

© 2024 Copyright Change Oracle.

Discover more from Change Oracle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading