Saturday, June 3, 2023
Change Oracle Logo
  • Climate Change
    • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • Biodiversity
    • Wildfires
    • Extreme Weather
  • Energy
    • Renewables
    • Nuclear Power
    • Fossil Fuels
  • Politics
    • American Politics
    • Canadian Politics
    • International Politics
  • Social Change
    • Activism
    • Disinformation
    • Education
    • Psychology
    • Gender Equality
  • Business and Economics
    • Leadership
    • Decarbonization
    • Economics
    • Supply Chains
    • Investing
  • Technology
    • Carbon Removal
    • Carbon Capture
    • Transportation
    • Buildings
    • Food
No Result
View All Result
  • Climate Change
    • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • Biodiversity
    • Wildfires
    • Extreme Weather
  • Energy
    • Renewables
    • Nuclear Power
    • Fossil Fuels
  • Politics
    • American Politics
    • Canadian Politics
    • International Politics
  • Social Change
    • Activism
    • Disinformation
    • Education
    • Psychology
    • Gender Equality
  • Business and Economics
    • Leadership
    • Decarbonization
    • Economics
    • Supply Chains
    • Investing
  • Technology
    • Carbon Removal
    • Carbon Capture
    • Transportation
    • Buildings
    • Food
No Result
View All Result
Change Oracle Logo
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics American Politics

Trump’s 2021 Budget Seeks to Slash Funding for Climate Action While Increasing Support for Fossil Fuels

by Richard Matthews
February 21, 2020
in American Politics, Other, Politics
0

US President Donald Trump’s proposed budget for fiscal 2021 seeks to kill climate action and science. This budget is a continuation of what we have seen in his previous three budgets. It includes opposition to pollution abatement, energy efficiency and renewable energy, while increasing support for fossil fuels. Here is a breakdown of how this budget impacts the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Energy, the Department of the Interior, and Climate Adaptation Science Centers.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Trump wants to eliminate 50 EPA programs including Energy Star and projects that make the US safer for Americans.  This includes programs that fight pollution, radon, lead, and those that give out clean water grants. He would like to reduce the number of employees at the EPA to their lowest levels in almost three and a half decades. and slash the agency’s funding by more than a quarter (26%). He wants to cut research and development at the EPA from $500 million to $281 million. Despite the long backlog of hazardous sites that need to be cleaned, Trump wants to cut funding to the Superfund which allocates money for cleaning up hazardous waste. He also wants to slash funding for land conservation and regulatory processes for developments on waterways and wetlands.

Department of Energy (DoE)

Trump wants to reduce funding at the DoE by 8 percent and he want to end or reduce funding to a number of climate related programs at scientific agencies. This includes eliminating the Advanced Research Projects Agency which would kill funding for renewables. While he wants to cut funding for energy research and development programs by half (from $5.3 billion to $2.8 billion), his budget seeks to continue to support dirty energy which further undermines the health of Americans and exacerbates climate change.

Department of the Interior (DOI)

Trump’s budget wants to slash funding at the DOI by 16 percent. If Trump had his way the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) would see a $144 million cut,  the Fish and Wildlife Service would see a $265 million cut and the National Park Service would see it’s budget slashed by $581 million. While cutting regulations for clean energy at the DOI,  Trump wants to fund the development of fossil fuels on federal lands with $195.5 million for the BLM oil and gas activities, and $18.9 million for its coal management program. His budget also throws public money at efforts to find new markets for coal, the dirtiest of dirty energy. He also wants to half the funding for the team that reviews the environmental impacts of major projects. Trump wants to stop federal land acquisitions by the Interior and Agriculture departments by cutting their budgets by more than 90 percent. (from $227 million to $18 million). This administration would also like to eradicate the budget of the the Land and Water Conservation Fund.

Climate Adaptation Science Centers (CASCS)

Trump’s 2021 budget would slash funding for the national and regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers (CASCS) eliminating all of $38 million allocated for research. CASCs provides actionable science
and research that directly addresses many of the climate-related
challenges unique to different regions of the country. Trump wants to kill the budget for all but one of the 8 regional centers.  Eliminating the regional centers would jeopardize important research on
how the earth is changing, as well as how wildlife is being impacted by
climate change.  As quoted by The Hill, Aaron Weiss, deputy director at the Center for Western Priorities, an environmental watchdog group said this is par for the course. 
“They have a track record of doing this,” Weiss is quoted as saying. “In a normal administration, you wouldn’t blow up eight other regional climate centers without going through Congress. I don’t know exactly what they’re going to do, but, this being their wishlist, I won’t be surprised if they try to put some of it into action without approval from Congress.” 

Sending a signal

“The presidential budget is all about sending signals,” Joel Clement, a whistleblower who left the Interior Department told The Hill. “The signal they’re trying to send is: We do not value climate science.” The good news is that Congress determines budgetary spending and Trump’s previous budgets have been largely ignored by lawmakers.  However, this budget  reaffirms that this president does not care about the health and safety of average Americans, nor does he care about climate change, sea level rise, pollution or extreme weather. “Congress should toss this Trump budget into the dustbin of history like
they’ve done with the other ones,” former EPA Administrator Gina
McCarthy said in a statement. “This
president is putting our families and communities at risk by taking
direct aim at the environment, public health and energy innovation. It
is unconscionable to take such drastic cuts to EPA, the Energy
Department and other agencies that keep us safe, protect our kids and
grow our clean energy economy,” she added. “At a time when we’re only
seeing greater risks from climate change, these agencies deserve to be
fully funded by Congress.” McCarthy is now with the NRDC. 

Related
Trump’s 2020 Budget Cuts Target Climate Science and Environmental Programs
Trump’s 2019 Budget Seeks to Erode Environmental Protections and Kill Climate Action
Trump’s 2018 Budget Cuts are a Declaration of War Against Environmental Protections, Climate Action and Scientific Research

ShareTweet
Previous Post

Climate Related Excerpts from the Ninth Democratic Primary Debate

Next Post

Why We Should Stand in Solidarity with the Wet’suwet’en People

Related Posts

State of Global Environmental Governance Issues 2023

by Richard Matthews
March 23, 2023
0

Environmental governance provides frameworks for the complex, multifaceted political, social, and economic actions required to address the polycrisis.  The urgency of the need for expedited action makes environmental governance more important than...

russia's invasion of ukraine from the perspective of climate and energy

Russia’s War on Ukraine From a Climate Perspective

by Richard Matthews
March 14, 2022
0

January 24, 2022, is a day that will live in infamy. This is the day that the Russian Federation led by President Vladimir Putin launched an unprovoked war against the...

101 Environmental Victories of 2021

Despite the Headlines, 2021 Was A Year Full of Environmental Victories

by Richard Matthews
January 4, 2022
1

You cannot be faulted for failing to notice the long list of environmental wins that occurred in 2021.  Good news stories do not have the sensationalistic allure of dramatic prophecies...

Next Post

Why We Should Stand in Solidarity with the Wet’suwet’en People

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • SoundCloud

Subscribe to the Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Disinformation

Fossil Fuel Industry Delays Climate Action With Disinformation

by Richard Matthews
May 16, 2023
0

After decades of controlling public narratives with disinformation, the fossil fuel industry is presiding over critical talks to limit global...

Read more

Fossil Fuels Have No Place at Climate Talks

April 30, 2023

Implementing Biophysical Socioeconomics: Ontology and Epistemology in Ecological Economics

April 3, 2023

State of Global Environmental Governance Issues 2023

March 23, 2023

Ecological Governance Respecting Planetary Boundaries through Degrowth and Social Processes

March 6, 2023
  • About
  • Climate Change
  • Energy
  • Business and Economics
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Social Change
  • Events
  • Other

© 2021 Copyright The Green Market Oracle.

No Result
View All Result
  • Business and Economics
    • Leadership
    • Supply Chains
  • Economics
  • Energy
    • Renewables
    • Nuclear Power
    • Fossil Fuels
  • Climate Change
    • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    • Biodiversity
    • Extreme Weather
    • Wildfires
  • Investing
  • Politics
    • American Politics
    • Canadian Politics
    • International Politics
  • Technology
    • Buildings
    • Carbon Capture
    • Food
    • Transportation
  • Social Change
    • Education
    • Activism
    • Psychology

© 2021 Copyright The Green Market Oracle.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In